The
night of Election Day, 2008, I found myself in the library writing a
paper. Genetics lab – and the fly report
– is infamous at Cornell, the bane of many aspiring biologists. As it turned out, this report was due the day
after Election Day. The morning of
Election Day, I woke up early, rode the bus to the local town hall, entered the
red-curtained booth, pulled the lever for my choice in candidates, and then
headed back to the library to write my report.
I worked late into the night; I could hear the cheers outside the window
as I alternated between writing about fly genetics and checking CNN every half
hour for election updates. I finished my
fly report a few hours after the race was called and then crashed on the couch
at lab for a few hours of shut-eye. I
was both thrilled with the Obama victory and exhausted from the demands of a
heavy course-load. I fell asleep
dreaming of a better tomorrow.
The
next day, as I headed to class wearing the rumpled clothing from the previous
day, I started hearing murmurs about a Proposition 8 that had been passed in
California. I was confused about what
Prop 8 was – something to do with gay marriage.
Since it was a California initiative, I assumed the proposition was in
support of gay marriage. I had been so
focused on the presidential election that I did not stop to think about what
else was going on in the rest of the country.
But, as I later found out, Proposition 8 was not in support of gay
marriage; it was a ban against gay marriage.
A little
while later, I began hearing about the Mormons and the role they played in getting Prop 8 passed. There are no
words to describe my devastation when I found out that the religion I was
raised in – and that my family actively supports – had invested so much time
and energy into stripping human beings of their right to marry. Before Election Day 2008, Mormonism had been a
part of my past, an identity that infused my up-bringing and had been responsible
for shaping my character. I had
complicated feelings about the culture and the authorities but Mormonism was
simply a quirky part of my up-bringing. My
identity as an agnostic humanist is owed, in part, to the rigor associated with
leaving Mormonism.
After Election Day 2008, my
relationship with Mormonism became much more complicated. There is no way to sugar-coat this issue - I
became ashamed of my up-bringing, of my family's association with a religion that had
actively campaigned to remove the rights of both friends and
acquaintances. With that initial flush of shame set in an
even deeper shame; how could I be ashamed of the religion that my family loves
so much? Pre-Prop-8, I had made a tenuous peace with Mormonism. Post-Prop-8, I found myself battling hurt and anger all over again.
There is a long history of
homophobia within the Mormon Church; Boyd K. Packer, one of the most out-spoken authorities on homosexuality, is next in line to become the
President of the Mormon Church. In 2010,
Boyd K. Packer, in a telecast watched by Mormons the world over, said "Some suppose that they were pre-set
and cannot overcome what they feel are inborn tendencies toward the impure and
unnatural. Not so! Why would our Heavenly Father do that to anyone?”*
Should the current leader, Thomas S. Monson, die, Boyd K. Packer will assume
leadership of the Mormon Church and be seen as a modern-day prophet, with the
power to commune with God and receive revelation for the Mormon Church at
large. Last month, in another world-wide televised
broadcast, the General Authority Dallin H. Oaks gave a speech titled “Protect the Children”, the topic of which was the danger of single-parent homes. Following his descriptions of the dangers
associated with children growing up without married parents, he proceeded to
state “We should assume the same
disadvantages for children raised by couples of the same gender.”
The Mormon Church’s stance on homosexuality
– along with their actions to actively suppress the rights of gays and lesbians
– is heart-breaking. At this point in
time, gay Mormons only have a limited set of options - mixed-orientation
heterosexual marriage, celibacy, or leaving the faith they were raised to
believe in. All of these are
heart-breaking options.
The truth is, I struggle to balance
the love I have for my family with my concerns about the teachings of
Mormonism. I am uncomfortable with prevalent insularity of Mormon culture, the
active hostility towards members who leave, and the swift punishment that is
meted out to members who express views that are not in alignment with the teachings of authorities. As a former Mormon with a
devout Mormon family, I find myself in a tenuous position. How do I balance my two worlds? How do I reconcile the love I have for my
family – for whom Mormonism is both an identity and a way of life - with my
deep unease over the intolerant actions of Mormon authorities? With every piece of writing, every
conversation, I find myself walking a fine line, one that carries the constant risk
of falling. How do I balance my own
personal convictions with the convictions of my family?
I love my Mormon family but
according to Mormon theology, I have thrown away my chances of being with them
for eternity. To my family, the most
hurtful part of my apostasy must be the simple fact that I will no longer be
with them for eternity. The obligations
of Mormonism that consume their lives are no longer part of my world-view; I am
no longer on the path to an eternity spent with my family, in spite of the fact
that I was raised with a full knowledge of the obligations that the Mormon
Heavenly Father expects of me. I am unable to grasp the concept of a loving God who requires rituals and a belief in a specific theology as a requirement to enter Heaven.
Heartbreak is found on both sides of the divide between Mormons and former Mormons.
Another Election Day is approaching,
historic for the fact that the Republican nominee is a devout Mormon. Once again, I find myself wondering what
impact the future will have on my relationship with my family and my
up-bringing. I have been watching this Mormon
moment, wondering what impact politics and religion will have on the relationships between
faithful members and former members. The
MormonThink controversy has reminded me of the omniscience of the Mormon
authorities and their willingness to suppress any truths that threaten the
church’s image. I wonder what will
happen when the eyes of the media are diverted from the actions of the Mormon Church. Will the actions of the Mormon Church cause a
further rift between faithful Mormons and non-believer family members or will the Mormon authorities work to create long-lasting
changes for a more tolerant future?
*Note: The transcript for Boyd K. Packer's speech was later amended following a public outcry. For that reason, I referred you to the original video of his speech; for a more detailed explanation of the changes made, I refer you to this article written by a gay-rights website.
Politics is a sticky subject in many families. However, it has intensified for Mormons lately because of their church's public presence in US politics. Here in CA I spoke with Mormons who opposed 8 personally but felt they had to obey the prophet -- that they would understand later why they had to work towards banning gay marriage. Very disturbing.
ReplyDeleteAnd in the meantime, innocent people get hurt.
ReplyDeleteI think you have read a lot if my thoughts in the Mormon Moment Series, so I will leave those there. What I would add is that I think it is important to find "family" who love and accept you without politics or religion mattering. Some people are lucky enough to be biologically related to most of the people who are part of your chosen family. I think that Mormons acknowledge this when they talk about "ward families," but the logical extension, that biology does not create love or obligations of service, gets lost.
ReplyDeleteSometimes I wish my siblings and I are closer, but when I am brutally honest, they are mostly nice people, who I wouldn't care about or want to have as a constant part of my life. My brother and I might be friends without being related, but not close friends. I don't know if that helps or not, but you are not alone in struggling with what being part of a family means, when some members of your family are not a good fit with your life.
Hugs!
Here's one of the things I could never get past.
ReplyDeleteIf the LDS church was led by a prophet hand picked by God, then why did the title always go to which ever of the 14 apostles had been serving the longest at the time of the current prophets death?
Since when did simple senority = divine providence?
Snow served less than 3 yrs, JFS less than 2yrs, Lee less than a single year, and Hunter was practiclly on his death bed the day after he was ordained.
For an all seeing god I find it odd that 25% of his chosen spokesmen died so quickly